I think it is more dependent on what they agree too than men and women's traditional roles. If they agreed for him to be the provider and her to take care of the house, that's fine (despite feminist comments like Steinem's).
There are problems with such arrangements: If he dies or leaves, she is left with having not kept up with market skills for the duration of their relationship.
There is no reason, NO REASON WHATSOEVER, that you can't reverse the genders in the above example. She makes all the money, he takes care of the home is perfectly viable as long as both agree to it. True, society still considers it new/unusual, often mistaking it for a parasitic relationship, but as long as it is agreed to, it isn't society's business.
What IS too much to ask is that (in your question) she be asked to cook, clean and do laundry after SHE has also worked all day, particularly if this is not the agreed-to relationship.
The feminist comment that women work all day, come home, and are then expected to take care of the house is not entirely BS (though men are certainly asked to change the tire on the road in the snow storm, clean the gutters, etc). It all comes back to what you agree too.
I have yet to see a guy push back and tell HER to clean the gutters, but in terms of labor, it is perfectly reasonable to ask that community chores be shared by the community in liew of previous agreements.